Secret Courts Make Secret Rulings About Secrecy

roberts

If the Obama administration stopped collecting our emails in 2011, why can’t it stop tapping our phones?  What inspired the administration to stop, anyway?  What constitutes necessary and unnecessary?  How can you determine what is necessary when you’re referring to a whole country?  The Obama administration needs the whole haystack?

This is what courts are for: to make such determinations, to create such categories, to render rulings for all to follow.  Ordinary courts, that is.  But the court that allowed the collection of all emails is the top-secret court created by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.  From windowless rooms in undisclosed locations, FISA courts seal all arguments and render opinions that they also deem classified secrets.  So now we can’t find the needle or the haystack.

Share on Facebook

This entry was posted in American Politics by Professor Ruth O'Brien. Bookmark the permalink.

About Professor Ruth O'Brien

Professor Ruth O'Brien, The Graduate Center, The City University of New York (CUNY)/ & Honorary Unaffiliated Academic Book Series Editor for The Public Square, Princeton University Press & Heretical Thought, Oxford University Press, USA Last book: Out of Many, One: Obama & the Third American Political Tradition (U of Chicago 2013). Social Media training by 365 Publics. Nickname: Professorette by Rush Limbaugh (see http://www.gc.cuny.edu/Faculty/Core-Bios/Ruth-O-Brien)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.