Tag: Writing Politics

  • Fresh, “Fresh Air”

    Is Terry Gross a man? No. Does she behave like a man? In literature about Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 this means that while Terry is not a man, she has behaved like one or perhaps treats other women like she herself is a man, a male interviewer.*

    Now, don’t get me wrong, I have always enjoyed her interviews. So judging Terry by Terry, shame on her. She is acting like a man. Terry Gross is sadly treating other women like she is a man, when she is not. She is treating this one interviewee at least in effect like a man or a male interviewer does. Having her started her show Fresh Air many decades back is irrelevant. Or to be fair, is no longer relevant.

    Don’t get me wrong. I listen to her show above all others. 

    And upon further reflection (as writing is wont to do, at least for me), I often skip her interviews when it comes to all the music or music business interviews that I don’t enjoy as much as book shows or shows in which an interviewer asks a book author or an artist a series of questions.

    This show was both. Barbra Streisand wrote her first book in a very long time, and she wrote it over a very long time.

    Rather than ponder this any more, why don’t you be the judge?

    And to be self-disclosing or in the nature of full self-disclosure, I’ve got a male friend from Claremont Men’s College, who calls routinely to see if I’m still not so good at assessing pop culture. I’m not. 

    Dan’s absolutely right. Being in the third class of women admitted into the institution when it went co-educational, I actually got my degree from Claremont McKenna College, or as we joked they found a male “M” named donor.

    Going back to Terry Gross and Fresh Air (now that so many guest interviewers or interviewers are on), seems more important than ever to weigh in. I was interested.

    What’s more, a perfectly “rational” explanation for Terry Gross’s male-equivalent techniques are disappointing to me. But then, again, when I accepted the diploma with men on it, that was supposed to be evidence of my being what many (not all) women from Scripps said about us: we were called Amazon women.

    Now, to be honest, that is down right offensive to me and the other women who decided to be trail blazers and even collect the degrees as evidence of this. Plus, what does this say about women who live in the Amazon? Not fair, either, at least in my book.

    So, check out Terry Gross’s interview of Barbra Streisand in early November 2023. She is also featured on the “best of” segment over the weekend. Then, get back and to me and/or tell me National Public Radio and/or Fresh Air whether they can do better.

    If Terry Gross does leave the show for a well-deserved retirement soon, or she starts to take even more time off (again deserved), perhaps they could open diversity up a wee bit more? Perhaps a person with a disability or two, along with a non-SCAM or SLAM identity could be given a go? 

    Remember: identity is not only about gender, race, sexuality, and ethnicity. Indeed, think big — there are more than enough folks who have at least two identities — those who are in retirement mode or nearing it, otherwise known as “seniors.” 

    A little “intersectionality” would go a long way, as Kimberle Crenshaw might write and/or say, no?** 

    In fact, I teach it as “compounding concentric circles” when a person comes to the table with multiple identities and disabilities.) Mind you, I teach politics at the largest public university in the United States – City University of New York.  I am housed in only one branch of the thirty odd campuses in New York City, or the Graduate Center.***

    * Ruth O’Brien, editor, Telling Stories Out of Court (New York: ILR Press, Cornell University Press).

    **Kimberle Crenshaw on “intersectionality” in her classic late twentieth century legal article.

    ***List of infuriating male-like questions to follow within the next month or so. Fresh Air, Terry Gross Barbra Streisand interview November 2023. https://www.npr.org/2023/11/08/1197958402/fresh-air-draft-11-08-2023 

    Rome
    MuckrakerIdaTarbell
  • WRITING POLITICS (APP)

    +We all get to hide behind theory.* “Theory’ for the uninitiated, the un-informed of my own public and academic or intellectual work, this means the whole body of my published work beginning in 1971, 2 or 3, not my published work in publications for and largely by adults.

    And, it is inclusive of my letters to very well-know authors or author in the 1960s.

    Indeed, my mother later apologized for shaming and therefore siilenc-ing me with the latter.** Virginia Frick O’Brien June 1927-December 2006)

    *

    **


    Yes, the asterisks are the only way one could draw the picture or get A Political Perspective (APP) about what the heck I am “talking” about.

    P.S., the + represents a book cover and/or artwork going forward.

    MuckrakerIdaTarbell
  • Polls and Faculty Rolls

    I learned the hard way to never, ever call an election. Now, its less that my colleagues across the nation with their little models and modeling get it wrong over and over. No, it’s more that when I was a Ph.D student UCLA couldn’t convince their female pollster to join our rolls. Faculty rules, go figure?*

    *is fill in the blank and/or plank of the GOP or the Dems as NR refers to them. I used to call them both bourg.! This really got my mom . . .

    MuckrakerIdaTarbell
  • CUNY Graduate Center Historian (Recently Retired) Distinguished Professor David Nasaw  wrote

    CUNY Graduate Center Historian (Recently Retired) Distinguished Professor David Nasaw wrote

    Kudos, David Nasaw! What a wonderful and insightful analysis, albeit a scary one.

    Living on the late-nineteenth-century female muckraker journalist Ida Tarbell’s island– Roosevelt Island — which is under the 59th Street Bridge (as those in Manhattan call it, as opposed to the Queensboro Bridge, as those from Queens call it, though it was relatively recently renamed the Ed Koch Bridge after the late former New York City Mayor), gives one a lot of APP (American Political Perspectives).

    The wet, dirty muck that Ida raked occurred after she checked herself into what was known as “Damnation Island” due to its appalling conditions and the way inmates from the all-male prison on the island took “care” of some of the women along with white male priests.

    While now it remains Roosevelt Island, Cornell Tech dominates it. Former Mayor Mike (or Michael) Bloomberg awarded approximately 37 acres to Cornell, the only private-public Ivy League institution of higher learning.

    So, I think I can speculate that Elon has been here at least once, if not more, and who knows? I might bump into him on the street.

    I can envision Elon rallying or the bolstering the idea of creating Cornell Tech given its unique location, being controlled by New York State though operated by New York City and technically part of Manhattan. Perhaps he supported getting all tech, especially “tech” education, off the “left” coast and in the financial capital of the world — New York City in New York State, rather than any land mass “down under.”

    As Cornell Tech changes Roosevelt Island, I’m glad to know I can count on insightful analysis by a CUNY Graduate Center historian, now retired, since I know his work on Hearst as well as Mellon and can rest assured that his historical analysis will include astute comments or make culturally appropriate comparisons to Robber Barons from one and two centuries ago, and how they dominated the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

    MuckrakerIdaTarbell
  • Frick-ed and Fracked or S.L.A.P.P.ed*?

    Frick-ed and Fracked or S.L.A.P.P.ed*?

    Not until I met and married Fred (who honored my father and mother when my sons walked me down the aisle), I had none other than my colleague, Fred’s long-lost relative, unite us in marriage. I would’ve been the second Ruth Ann Schwarz. Instead, Fred is the first Frederic Halper O’Brien, though we began our journey as Fred and Ruth O’Brien. Only 9 states in this union allowed him to change his name as he did in the Brookhaven Town marriage-license office.

    During our past tenth anniversary, we did another reciprocal thing. He suggested I stop hiding my direct lineage to Henry Clay Frick (named after a Speaker of the House, I presume). So here it is: I’m Ruth Frick (my grandmother’s first and last names) eschewing that middle name once my sons were grown. They too were burdened with English-Dutch-Swiss-Irish-Scottish-Swedish descent, though I am proud to say they speak, read, listen and have learned German and Dutch and only lack lessons in Swedish. But heck, knowing German/Dutch/English — it’s close enough.

    * Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (ask Wendy and Sylvia, part of the far west Frick clan 🙂

    MuckrakerIdaTarbell
  • MuckrakerIdaTarbell
  • Heretic . . .

    Heretic . . .

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_O%27Brien

    Just in. And I am trying to have a news-less day. But my mini(computer) that is is too observant. “Grr”

    Death of Democracy

    The title is”How Disinformation Splintered and Became More Intractable” in the New York Times the website webpage version of course.

    MuckrakerIdaTarbell
  • MuckrakerIdaTarbell
  • Chuck (Grassley) called my mom……

    Chuck (Grassley) called my mom……

    Representative (now Senator) Chuck Grassley called my mother when I was 18 years old.  Why?  I had just graduated from the Capitol Page School, with the nation’s highest-paid teachers in terms of money per student, with a 99.999999% graduation rate not just from high school but from some of the best universities in our nation.  I ratted the school out for the inferior instruction it offered.*  Congressman Grassley said my mother should be proud of me for being a whistleblower — and I guess he knew what I had weathered.  I don’t know. A good friend of mine says he is evil.  She is a litigator and understands how Grassley is gaslighting Professor Christine Blasey Ford.  I agree — what could I say other than “he called my mother”?  But to be honest, when he called my mother, she was not impressed, as I remember.  Only impressed enough to relay the quick call.  I didn’t think a thing about it until I spoke with my litigator friend (why would I?) — he became a Senator, and while he supports whistleblowers, they are largely the ones who whistle the Republican tune.  Look what he’s doing to Ford now! When it came time for college, most of my relatives faced a choice — the farm (Stanford) versus the city (Berkeley).  For me, the choice was not the farm versus the city.  My mom wanted me to go to a small women’s liberal-arts school, preferably the one she had attended, not one of those Seven Sisters schools.  Not only the Sister schools were excluded; my mom was also down on the Ivies, even though my ancestor helped start one — a proFESSor of religion, no less, helped found Brown University by proFESSing religion at the Hopewell Academy, which later moved to Rhode Island (Anabaptist country). No one was going to the East Coast Establishment. Meanwhile, Stanford — where they ruined women, I was told — and anything east of Los Angeles were out.  So I came home, back West to California, as was appropriate.  My mother managed to get me/allow me (she had no control, since I was writing my own applications far from home) to go to an all-male college that was turning co-ed.  Now that was no fun -— or was it fun?  Actually, I enjoyed it.  It had been Claremont Men’s College, and after coeducation they found a donor whose name began with M, and it became Claremont McKenna College, preserving the CMC acronym. But first they had to deal with the GCO Club — Get Cunts Out — of diehard misogynists.  Seems kinda like the club that Brett Kavanagh would join — or was that only in high school? Why won’t he allow the FBI to do a full investigation, anyhow?  Why does he want to enter the Supreme Court with a rapist cloud over his head?  After all, Clarence Thomas didn’t even speak in court for over a decade, knowing how little credibility he had/has.  Who made the last phone call to Anita — his wife, no less?  Wasn’t that bizarre?  My only guess would be she got hammered one night and is still mad about how Clarence cheated on her — or didn’t tell her the full story that she knows/suspects, and that’s about his predilection for pornography. —————– * I ratted them out despite being threatened in front of the whole school for maligning a 150-year-old institution, since I was the rat “going” over there — the Doorkeeper’s Door — and complaining that we weren’t getting enough education.  All the House of Representatives pages followed the few Senate pages’ problem — that pages could no longer go to school from 6:00 to 9:00, but instead from 6:00 to 6:30 or 7:00, including the breakfast break.  Then they reduced our classes to five, but we still only got as far as roll call before leaving.  I was in school, yet I was learning absolutely nothing, and the principal’s and vice principal’s defense was — anyway, full circle.  I ratted them out.  I was not the first or the last, and it was under Speaker of the House John Boehner that they got rid of House pages in 2011.
    MuckrakerIdaTarbell
  • Two Rights Make an Exhilarating Left – Showcasing a Leader Who Happens to Be a Woman

    Two Rights Make an Exhilarating Left – Showcasing a Leader Who Happens to Be a Woman

      Listen to this exchange, elevating and advancing the most significant postwar political thinker – Hannah Arendt — who happens to be a woman in the United States. Indeed, a newly vacant seat is named after her. This woman spoke truth to power in 1963 in The New Yorker, and took a lot of flak for it — so much so that she passed away tired at another venerable institution that hosts her name – Bard College.

    What I’m talking about is that Chelsea and Corey got into it this weekend. Chelsea Clinton tweeted that the burning of an LGBT youth center in Phoenix reflects Hannah Arendt’s most famous and infamous phrase — “the banality of evil.” Corey Robin, my esteemed colleague, a full professor at the City University of New York, corrected Chelsea, saying that she had misunderstood and that Arendt was actually saying the exact opposite of what she thought.

    Now, no one likes a correction, so Chelsea took Corey’s bait, and they went back and forth at some length, she maintaining that the Arendt phrase was apposite and he maintaining that it wasn’t.

    This is, according to two more political scientists (Brendan Nyhan and Jason Reifler), an example of the “backfire effect” — which is fodder for another blog, so going back to the Chelsea/Corey brainy brawl, Chelsea repeatedly stood up and defended herself, only to be corrected by Corey again and again.

    Corey has the better argument, though Chelsea (who initiated the discussion) is doing us a civil service, as Corey points out. Chelsea, as the author of a bestselling children’s book (She Persisted), is really setting the agenda to let women speak as leaders — really saying women are leaders.

    How could Chelsea not be right in instigating and showcasing the most heretical political thinker who happens to be a woman in the United States? To top it all off, Hannah Arendt was an immigrant, a refugee, in exile – and she can no longer defend (i.e. correct) how understood and misunderstood is her political thought – though we have all benefited from it and a new book series is launching with other heretical thinkers, men and women alike.

    Chelsea Clinton is right. Corey Robin is right. Chelsea is showcasing how women happen to lead. I’m going to get Chelsea’s book, and reread Corey’s analysis.

    MuckrakerIdaTarbell
  • assembly by Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri

    assembly by Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri

    First book in Heretical Thought book series Edited by Ruth O'Brien, The Graduate Center, CUNY  Heretical Thought

    To buy ADVANCE copy click here

    Thought is heretical when it threatens our idea of universality, or our notion of the self or selves. Such threats can occur in the face of advances in science, human science, governance, or media.  Regardless of purpose or intent, heretical ideas shape and determine our bodies and our consciousness and/or the ways we communicate about them.  They also embody seismic or significant breaks in sclerotic contemporary political thought.

    This series is shaped by the notion that contemporary political thought that advances significant or seismic ideas, independent of purpose or intent, and also threatens our ideas of universality, is heretical. Books in the series expose contemporary ruptures in thought, or a break in a school of thought.  In doing so they will make visible, or apparent, threats that are observable, empirical, biological, chemical, or physical in the universe — suggesting not only how such threats can compel new ways of thinking, but also how they can lead to productive political action.

    Series editor, Ruth O’Brien, The Graduate Center, City University of New York

     

    MuckrakerIdaTarbell